The incident involving Mohammed Siraj's 'send-off' to Travis Head has become a significant topic of discussion following the second Test match between India and Australia. During Day 2 of the pink-ball Test in Adelaide, Siraj took the wicket of Head, who had scored an impressive 140 runs, and delivered a vociferous send-off. This action was understandably met with disapproval from Head, who retaliated with a sharp remark directed at the Indian pacer. Following the match, Head asserted that his comment was merely 'well bowled,' to which Siraj responded by accusing him of dishonesty.

Ultimately, the matter was resolved when Siraj and Head reconciled with a handshake and embrace after the match. Nevertheless, the International Cricket Council (ICC) appears poised to take action. Although no formal penalties have been imposed as of yet, the governing body of world cricket is preparing to address the situation involving both players. Former Australian cricketer Simon Katich weighed in on the controversy, labelling Siraj's behaviour as unnecessary and describing it as a 'brain fade.' Katich further suggested that Siraj would likely reflect on his actions with regret, emphasizing the importance of emotional control in such high-stakes moments.

"It wasn't a great look. Unfortunately, Siraj experienced a moment of lapse in judgment… such behaviour is unwarranted in the sport. He will likely regret his actions… it was a spontaneous reaction, and after dismissing Mitchell Starc shortly thereafter, he appeared quite contrite. Emotions can be difficult to manage in the heat of the moment, especially following a challenging situation," Katich remarked on SEN Radio.

'Travis Head's innings didn't deserve that finish'

Head maintained his strong affinity for India, scoring centuries in red-ball, white-ball, and pink-ball formats. His impressive 140 runs off 141 balls played a crucial role in establishing a 151-run lead for Australia over India, a margin that ultimately proved decisive. Similar to Siraj, Head exhibited a passionate reaction, though he was a response to provocation rather than an initial confrontation. Katich believes that Head's performance warranted acknowledgement from Siraj and the Indian team, rather than the other way around.

"His innings did not deserve to conclude in that manner. I believe Travis Head's reaction was a response to the gesture directed at him, and one cannot fault him for feeling upset about it. Upon his dismissal, he had just delivered a match-winning performance, and the response should have been the reverse," Katich remarked.

Finally, Katich expressed hope that the incident between Siraj and Head would influence the dynamics of the ongoing series. Historically, the Border-Gavaskar Trophy has been marked by intense rivalry, yet recently, the two teams have begun to foster a more amicable atmosphere. Nevertheless, with the series tied at 1-1 and significant stakes involved, one can anticipate heightened tensions in the upcoming matches in Brisbane, Melbourne, and Sydney.

"He should have approached him, offered a gesture of goodwill, and said ‘well played’. I hope this does not escalate the series, but given the recent history between India and Australia, it is likely to become increasingly intense in the forthcoming tests as the series hangs in the balance," Katich added.

Read Also: Jasprit Bumrah's Honest Reflection: A Career Countdown of 6-7 Months

HOW DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? CHOOSE YOUR EMOTICON!