Yashasvi Jaiswal's dismissal on the final day of the Boxing Day Test ignited controversy, as the young opener was ruled out despite the Snicko technology not registering any edge. The decision made by the third umpire faced criticism from former Indian cricketers and fans on social media platforms. Jaiswal attempted a hook shot but misplayed it against a short-pitched delivery from pacer Pat Cummins, leading to an appeal for a caught-behind dismissal. Initially, on-field umpire Joel Wilson deemed him not out. However, following a DRS review, which showed no spike on the Snicko, third umpire Saikat Sharfuddoula controversially ruled him out, claiming there was a deflection off Jaiswal's gloves or bat based on visual evidence.

After scoring 84 runs, Jaiswal made his way back to the pavilion amidst chants of "cheater, cheater" directed at the Australian team from the crowd at the Melbourne Cricket Ground.

Former umpire Simon Taufel provided his perspective on the contentious decision, asserting that Saikat made the correct call. 

"In my opinion, the decision was out. The third umpire ultimately made the right determination," Taufel stated during an interview with Channel 7.

He emphasized that when there is a clear deflection off the bat, there is no necessity to consult additional technology to validate the decision.

"According to the technology protocols, we have a hierarchy of redundancy, and when the umpire observes a clear deflection off the bat, there is no requirement to pursue further technology to substantiate the case. The clear deflection serves as conclusive evidence. In this instance, the third umpire utilized a secondary form of technology, which, for reasons unknown, did not provide the same conclusive audio evidence to support the clear deflection," he elaborated.

Jaiswal was performing well and appeared to be guiding India towards a draw before the team suffered a series of quick dismissals in their pursuit of 340 runs, ultimately losing by 184 runs.

Taufel remained resolute in his belief that the third umpire's decision was justified.

Sunil Gavaskar livid after Yashasvi Jaiswal 'wrongly given out'

Batting legend Sunil Gavaskar expressed his strong discontent with the decision made by the third umpire, suggesting it was merely an 'Optical Illusion.'

"There will likely be discussions involving the match referee and the umpires. If the technology is not to be utilized, then what is its purpose? This will certainly be a point of contention for the Indian team. While it appeared that the ball may have touched the gloves, this could very well be an Optical Illusion. It is common to observe that when the ball is new, it can come close to the edge of the bat and then veer away. This creates an optical illusion for those watching, leading them to believe there was a nick," Gavaskar remarked during his commentary on Channel Seven.

Read Also: Mitchell Starc's Bail-Switching Tactics Backfire as Yashasvi Jaiswal Stays Unfazed

HOW DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? CHOOSE YOUR EMOTICON!