‘Don’t Be Grumpy’: Clarke on IPL’s $3M Paydays Shifting Players’ Priorities

‘Don’t Be Grumpy’: Clarke on IPL’s $3M Paydays Shifting Players’ Priorities

1 day ago | 5 Views

The Indian Premier League (IPL) and the substantial financial resources it offers players have frequently sparked the ongoing debate between national representation and club commitments in the realm of cricket. Many international players often find themselves choosing one over the other; however, former Australian captain Michael Clarke believes there is nothing inherently wrong with a cricketer prioritizing the IPL over their national responsibilities.

Clarke, who played during a time when the IPL had not yet reached its current level of prominence, traditionally adheres to the principle of putting country first. Nevertheless, he acknowledges the rapidly evolving landscape of cricket worldwide and asserts that both players and governing bodies must adapt to these changes.

"It doesn’t matter if you’re Pat Cummins. If you aren’t performing well, they will find someone else. You must be at your best. Josh Hazlewood and Mitchell Marsh have both faced injuries, yet they are still considered for the IPL. These players recognize that this is a significant tournament. Starc has turned down various deals over the years to represent Australia. He withdrew from the Champions Trophy but openly stated his commitment to the IPL. I grew up in an era where playing for your country was paramount," Clarke remarked on the Beyond23 Cricket podcast.

"If you are feeling exhausted and in need of a break, then refrain from participating in any tournament. We must adapt to the times. It is essential to understand this. There is no reason to be resentful if an Australian cricketer earns 2-3 million dollars for an 8-week commitment. I am not suggesting that they should prioritize it over national play. However, the days of being overly critical of players are behind us. How can they not embrace this opportunity? It’s a clear choice."

David Warner and Steve Smith are classic examples

Clarke's insights highlight the significant evolution of the IPL since its early days. The exclusion of prominent players like Steve Smith and David Warner illustrates that a player's stature or previous accomplishments hold little weight in the current context. When a player is no longer considered relevant, it is essential to move on and find a suitable replacement. The IPL has embraced a competitive approach, which is simply the nature of the league.

"I observe that several players, particularly from Australia, have been overlooked. David Warner, who has been part of the IPL since its inception, remains unsold. This marks a considerable shift and is indicative of the current landscape. Once you step back from international cricket and are not actively participating as an overseas player, many teams will seek alternatives," Clarke remarked.

"Steve Smith had an outstanding Champions Trophy and continues to be a strong performer in the short format, having done well with the Sydney Sixers, yet he remains unselected. From Australia's viewpoint, representing your country is highly valued, and consistently scoring runs and taking wickets at the right moments is what these teams prioritize."

Read Also: Abhishek Sharma Smashes Fire Extinguisher Glass with Monster Six Before IPL 2025

Get the latest Bollywood entertainment news, trending celebrity news, latest celebrity news, new movie reviews, latest entertainment news, latest Bollywood news, and Bollywood celebrity fashion & style updates!

HOW DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? CHOOSE YOUR EMOTICON!

#