Melbourne: As we approach an unusual fifth day of a Test match, the anticipation of what lies ahead is captivating. Few sports allow for the opportunity to pause, regroup, and reset in the manner that Test cricket does, making the second innings an intriguing prospect. While facing a deficit, there exists a distinct chance to leave past struggles behind and commence afresh.

At the conclusion of Day 4 of the Boxing Day Test at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, Australia held a commanding lead of 333 runs. The record for the highest successful run chase at the MCG stands at 332/7, achieved by England in 1929. In this century, the highest successful chase at the venue is 231; nevertheless, the home team opted against declaring their innings.

This decision may stem from a reluctance to take risks or a belief that, after a full day of batting, the pitch may not yet offer sufficient assistance to the bowlers. Regardless, the Indian team would have welcomed the absence of late batting, as no player desires to face a brief session after extensive time in the field.

The day was marked by fluctuations, primarily due to the relentless excellence of Jasprit Bumrah (24-7-56-4), who had the Australians reeling at 91/6. However, a combination of missed catches (three by Yashasvi Jaiswal alone) and determination allowed Pat Cummins and his team to finish the day at 228/9. Mohammed Siraj, rebounding from a lackluster first innings, also shone with figures of 3/66.

Central to Australia's resurgence on Sunday was Marnus Labuschagne, who appeared to regain his customary fortune during his crucial innings of 70. He was the sole batter to face Bumrah with a measure of assurance, and his contributions significantly bolstered Australia's total into a more secure position.

With memories of India's remarkable chases still fresh, the hosts remained vigilant regarding the pitch's condition and its potential impact on batting. Will Day 5 witnessed a decline in the pitch's quality, making batting increasingly challenging?

“I can’t probably predict tomorrow,” Labuschagne remarked. “But I can just sort of talk about today. I think from the first innings the...

We are observing an increase in the number of deliveries striking the stumps, with more balls skidding through. This trend is reflected in the data we are analyzing, which indicates that this is likely the primary distinction observed. The seam movement appears to have remained consistent.

Typically, the pitch does not improve significantly by the fifth day; thus, it is reasonable to assume that batting may prove challenging during a considerable portion of the fourth innings. While discussions of a potential victory are prevalent, a review of the Australian innings reveals that India must proceed with considerable caution.

Australia experienced the loss of wickets at regular intervals throughout the day, with their highest partnership totalling 57 runs, which occurred only after the Indian bowlers had effectively dismantled the top order. Labuschagne found a capable partner in Cummins, and their collaboration helped the team navigate a precarious situation. Subsequently, when the innings appeared to be concluding, Nathan Lyon and Scott Boland formed an unbroken partnership of 55 runs for the last wicket.

This partnership also ensured that Australia consumed valuable time. If India is afforded too much time, a chase could become feasible. While this remains a possibility, the timing must be precise, and the visitors are unlikely to adopt an overly aggressive approach too soon.

Is it premature for Indian supporters to envision a miraculous outcome akin to that at the Gabba? Labuschagne believes there are significant differences to consider.

"The wicket at the Gabba was quite flat," remarked the Australian No. 3. "There were some cracks developing, but the main surface was quite good. It resembled a Day 2 pitch on Day 1, being relatively firm. There was a bit of bounce, typical of Brisbane, but overall it was a favourable wicket.

"Moreover, we were in a position during that Test where winning the series was imperative. Therefore, we needed to set a target. Ideally, we would have preferred to set a higher total for India and bowl fewer overs, but given the necessity to win, we had to take some risks."

India still needs to secure the final Australian wicket, and they are yet to do so.

Read Also: Nitish Reddy's Century: A Response to Doubters in the Cricketing World

HOW DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? CHOOSE YOUR EMOTICON!