Director Upendra faces a significant dilemma regarding a script he authored, leading him to pursue an alternative direction in filmmaking. This decision results in a movie that polarizes viewers, with some advocating for its prohibition. A critic, having viewed the film several times and grappling with its meaning, embarks on a quest to uncover the filmmaker's true message. In the process, he discovers the original script and the narrative of Satya versus Kalki.

Real Star Upendra is keenly anticipating the release of this film.

UI movie review: As the credits concluded at the end of UI, the audience's complete lack of response was hardly unexpected. It was not a silence filled with awe, but rather a state of perplexity. Numerous attendees expressed their confusion with remarks such as “Thale ketolide,” indicating that they struggled to grasp Upendra's intentions with the film. It is worth noting that these individuals were fans of the filmmaker-actor, who had attended the early morning screening, fully anticipating his unique style of cinema.

I must acknowledge that I am not part of Upendra’s intended audience. For me, cinema should be both engaging and entertaining; I do not seek moral lessons within the confines of a movie theatre. While subtle messaging can be acceptable, an unrelenting barrage on the senses regarding themes of good versus evil, human-induced issues like ecological degradation, and the various divides—social, economic, political, and religious—are decidedly unwelcome, particularly when presented in a preachy manner, despite attempts to disguise it with so-called ‘commercial elements,’ such as romance and glamour featuring Reeshma Nanaiah, along with a dose of action for added effect.

At its essence, UI revolves around making informed decisions across various aspects of life; decisions grounded in rational thought rather than shaped by external influences. The film also serves as a platform for the filmmaker to articulate his views on politics, collective behaviour, and similar themes. While he presents several valid arguments, one must question their effectiveness. Will a visual appeal for social change lead to tangible results? The film is characterized as embodying the ‘typical Upendra style,’ but should this standard be upheld consistently, especially when the result appears lacklustre and unworthy of the effort invested?

During the film's promotional activities, Upendra remarked that although UI encompasses multiple layers, he has structured it in a manner that is accessible to all viewers. Indeed, there is a significant amount of simplification present. The filmmaker has made Upendra’s insights readily digestible, eliminating the need for deep contemplation to grasp the fundamental concepts. The film, spanning two hours, is densely packed with content, and viewers may find themselves overlooking certain details amidst the chaos.

Upendra on UI: The fundamental narrative is comprehensible to all, but the interpretation of its layers is left to individual viewers.

UI is fundamentally a showcase for Upendra, who even takes on a dual role. In Kalki, he truly expresses himself, delivering one universal truth after another. The supporting cast, however, appears as mere caricatures. The background music by Ajaneesh Loknath is commendable, yet the visual effects, particularly those involving strobe lighting, may induce discomfort.

UI movie verdict: To paraphrase a line from a Mammootty film, UI is a movie that requires sense, sensitivity, and sensibility to appreciate. While deciphering its content is not particularly complex, the enjoyment derived from it is entirely subjective. This film may resonate with some viewers, but it did not resonate with me.

Read Also: Vanvaas Review: A Melodramatic Journey Through Familial Strife

HOW DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? CHOOSE YOUR EMOTICON!