In an unexpected development, Shawn Carter, better known as Jay-Z, has made a significant retreat from his legal confrontation with the attorney representing the purported victim in a concerning case that involves both him and music mogul Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs. As reported by RadarOnline, the rapper is altering his strategy to have the case dismissed, in light of the sensational allegations of sexual assault that have garnered widespread media attention.

Jay-Z’s lawyer requests withdrawal in the recent case

Alex Shapiro, the longstanding attorney for Jay-Z and Diddy, submitted a letter to Judge Analisa Torres requesting the withdrawal of Defendant Shawn Carter's Motion for Sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, stating, “We write on behalf of Defendant Shawn Carter to respectfully request that Mr Carter’s Motion for Sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 be withdrawn at this time, without prejudice.”

Additionally, he noted, “We have discussed this matter with counsel for Plaintiff who consents to this submission and agrees the withdrawal is without prejudice."

Earlier, the rapper known for "99 Problems" initiated a lawsuit to dismiss a case brought by an anonymous woman who accused him and Diddy of raping her when she was 13 years old, arguing that the allegations were “too old to pursue," as reported by RadarOnline.

Jay-Z’s lawsuit claiming the allegations are ‘too old’

The judge also rejected the rapper's request to reveal the identity of the now 24-year-old anonymous woman. In a two-page correspondence addressed to Judge Torres, he stated, “The plaintiff cannot seek recovery for her sole claim under the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act (the GMV Law), as a matter of law, due to the statute's lack of retroactive effect.”

The letter further elaborated, “The plaintiff alleges a violation of the GMV Law for actions that allegedly took place in September 2000. However, the GMV Law was not enacted until December 19, 2000, which is three months after the alleged conduct occurred, and thus cannot be applied retroactively to establish a cause of action that was not available to the plaintiff at that time.”

The victim contended that the purported rape occurred during an afterparty in New York City following the 2000 MTV Video Music Awards.

Read Also: Diddy Allegedly Threatened Ex-Employee: ‘I Could Kill You, No One Would Know’

Get the latest Bollywood entertainment news, trending celebrity news, latest celebrity news, new movie reviews, latest entertainment news, latest Bollywood news, and Bollywood celebrity fashion & style updates!

HOW DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE? CHOOSE YOUR EMOTICON!