In the midst of numerous events unfolding around us, the act of multitasking may appear to be the sole method for regaining control and comprehending the chaos. In the relentless pursuit of time, one often feels as though time is perpetually slipping away. Consequently, multitasking emerges as a seemingly viable solution.

Managing various tasks at once might give the impression of increased efficiency and time savings. However, one must question whether this approach is genuinely productive or if it is, in fact, depleting your energy.

In a recent interview, Dr. Ajit Dandekar, Head of the Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health at Nanavati Max Super Speciality Hospital in Mumbai, provided an in-depth analysis of the science underlying multitasking, the appropriate limits to set, and other related insights. He characterized multitasking as a 'double-edged sword.'

Impact on efficiency

Multitasking undermines both efficiency and the quality of the results produced. It entails engaging in two or more tasks simultaneously and frequently shifting focus between them. Dr. Dandekar elaborated on how this task-switching incurs costs that detract from overall efficiency.

He stated, “Multitasking can be a double-edged sword, yielding varying outcomes based on the context and nature of the tasks. Numerous studies indicate that individuals may struggle to maintain comparable levels of efficiency and accuracy due to the ‘switching costs’—the mental effort required to reorient and adjust to new tasks. While multitasking has become essential in today’s professional landscape, it can also result in cognitive overload and fatigue.”

When multitasking works and when it does not

Recognizing the delicate balance in effective multitasking hinges on the nature and intensity of the tasks at hand. The frequent switching between tasks or attempting to engage in multiple activities simultaneously can induce stress. Often, these tasks may conflict with one another, and what initially appears to enhance productivity may, in fact, result in a decrease in overall efficiency.

It is essential to discern which tasks are amenable to multitasking and which are not. Certain high-demand activities necessitate focused, undivided attention, whereas routine, automated tasks can be effectively managed alongside others.

Dr. Dandekar elaborated on this nuanced perspective, stating, “It has been noted that some individuals possess a greater aptitude for multitasking, particularly when the tasks involved are automated and require minimal manual effort. Activities that demand intense concentration, such as writing or problem-solving, should not be attempted while multitasking, as this can disrupt focus and diminish efficiency. Conversely, combining two automated or creative tasks, such as painting or sculpting while listening to music, can yield positive results. Additionally, integrating desk-related tasks with some physical activities can alleviate monotony and enhance concentration. It is advisable to multitask strategically, avoiding the combination of tasks that draw upon similar cognitive resources.”

Highlighting the potential drawbacks of multitasking, he remarked, “It is crucial to recognize the point at which multitasking leads to stress, errors, or a decline in productivity. While multitasking is an inevitable aspect of modern life, understanding when to concentrate on a single task can significantly enhance effectiveness and reduce fatigue.”

Grasping the differences in task types and their respective intensities is vital to ensure that multitasking contributes to productivity rather than leading to burnout.

Women better at multitasking

Dr. Dandekar emphasized that women may possess a natural advantage in multitasking abilities. He stated, "Women have historically excelled at multitasking, likely due to its evolution as a survival mechanism. Since the Stone Age, they have balanced responsibilities such as child-rearing, cooking, home management, and social interaction, while men concentrated on hunting. This long-standing practice of managing various duties may have enhanced their capacity to perform multiple tasks simultaneously."

In summary, effective multitasking necessitates a careful assessment of the tasks involved. Depending on the nature of the work, individuals should determine whether multitasking is appropriate. Certain tasks require significant cognitive engagement and may not be conducive to multitasking, as they demand focused attention. Attempting to incorporate additional tasks could result in burnout.

Rather than multitasking, it is advisable to concentrate on a single task to achieve higher-quality results.

Read Also: Time vs. Mind: The Best and Worst Hours for Mental Health

Get the latest Bollywood entertainment news, trending celebrity news, latest celebrity news, new movie reviews, latest entertainment news, latest Bollywood news, and Bollywood celebrity fashion & style updates!